Editorial: Moral Bankruptcy Does Not Count in Sackler Family Protection Agreement | Editorial


St. Louis Post-Dispatch

A federal judge on Dec. 16, properly overturned a disgusting federal bankruptcy court-approved deal that allowed the infamous pharmaceutical Sackler family to escape future liability in the national opioid addiction crisis the family had helped to instigate. to create.

U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon saw through the flagrant abuse of the bankruptcy court system to protect family members who were morally bankrupt but nowhere near financial bankruptcy and had nothing to do to tie their personal liability protection to the larger settlement affecting their business, Purdue Pharma.

While McMahon’s decision could mean more years of delays and court battles, it’s worth the time and expense to ensure the Sacklers don’t escape full responsibility for knowingly flooded the market with a highly addictive product, OxyContin, while falsely claiming it was not addictive. .

the damage they inflicted in cities and towns across the country demands that the Sackler family be held fully accountable – financially and legally. They have enriched themselves by ruining millions of lives, tearing families apart and causing financial turmoil in cities like St. Louis, forcing their law enforcement and social agencies to deal with homelessness and addiction-related crime. Mexican cartels capitalized on OxyContin addictions by marketing heroin as a cheaper and more accessible alternative. Drug gangs have flooded the streets with guns, contributing heavily to today’s high urban homicide rates.

People also read…

  • CASEY: Couple lose $55,000 after fake text message, allegedly from their bank
  • Saturday morning briefing: Sunday storm takes a crisper turn after first snowfall
  • Watch now: West Virginia reporter hit by car on live TV – and continues to report
  • Late Sunday afternoon update: sleet continues into the afternoon after snowfall accumulation of 4 to 7 inches
  • Latest defendants plead guilty in deadly 2018 Giles County home invasion
  • Brief thaw on Wednesday before the risk of snow at the end of the week
  • In the wake of the winter storm, stay off the roads Monday in Roanoke, New River Valleys, officials urge
  • McFarling: Hokies’ Pry is already picking up wins
  • Virginia Tech basketball fans not bothered by new vaccination policy
  • Weather delays, closures and cancellations for Tuesday, January 18, 2022
  • Franklin County Militia Ask Supervisors For Help
  • Wrongful death lawsuit against Salem VA settled for $550,000
  • Montgomery County reorganizations: One sets precedent, the other is thorny
  • Weather delays, closures and cancellations for Thursday, January 20, 2022
  • Conservative student views chilled by Virginia Tech policies, free speech group says

The Sacklers have donated billions of dollars to fund major art facilities and museum wings across the country, as if to whitewash their guilt. On December 9, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York announced that the Sackler name would be removed from seven exhibition spaces.

In September, a federal bankruptcy judge reluctantly signed the agreement that granted the Sacklers protection. The Sacklers agreed to dissolve Purdue Pharma and pay $4.5 billion to states that had filed claims. But the family had already transferred around $10 billion to offshore accounts in the years before the settlement, putting the money out of reach.

Even at the time of the bankruptcy settlement, the judge who approved the deal expressed extreme unease with the arrangement, saying, “It’s a bittersweet outcome. BITTER.”

In rescinding the deal, McMahon echoed concerns raised by this newspaper and others that the federal bankruptcy system was never designed to award liability protections to people not directly connected with a filing for bankruptcy, who are not financially bankrupt and, in fact, are very wealthy.

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson perhaps put it best: “There can’t be two forms of justice – one for ordinary Americans and a different one for billionaires.” He acknowledged that potentially difficult and contentious days are ahead, but the need to hold the Sackler family accountable remains paramount. “I’m prepared to take this fight all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary, to secure true accountability for the Sackler family.”


About Author

Comments are closed.